Asst. Attorney General indicted for child porn!

datePosted on 07:01, September 18th, 2009 by Admin

Hallowell, ME
9/4/09

Former assistant attorney general, James M. Cameron, 46, has been indicted on 16 counts of child pornography!

James M. Cameron was in charge of all of Maine’s drug prosecutors until they realized he was the one who needed prosecuting and fired him in April of 2008. He was fired when it made news that he was being investigated for child porn.

Can you blame the state for firing him? Here he is prosecuting people for pulling a mushroom out of the ground and smoking it, when he’s allegedly doing something 100 times worst! By purchasing child porn, you’re paying for a child to be raped. It’s that simple. Child porn is not just a bunch of pictures of children standing around nude. It’s children being raped. And why are they photographing children being raped? – Money. That’s what it comes down to. They’re raping these kids and photographing it just to sell the pics to perverts for money. If nobody bought the porn, the children wouldn’t be raped. So, this is a very serious crime. If it’s true, then that means that this prosecutor payed for children to be raped by downloading it.

A grand jury returned a 16 count indictment against Cameron for transporting, receiving and possession of child porn.

“Cameron is accused of uploading images of child pornography to an Internet-based Yahoo photo album using five different screen names. He allegedly transmitted digital images of child pornography using Google Hello, an Internet-based chat and file-sharing service. The case was investigated by the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit.”

He was released on a $75,000 unsecured bond and has been living in Michigan since his arraignment.

As can be expected, his defense attorney, (you know, the people he’s been battling all these years, that is, until he broke the law and now needs one) is challenging the search warrant that was used to enter his house.

“Rodway had disputed the power of the judge to sign the search warrant, claimed the scope of the warrant was too broad, and said the search of computer files was performed long after the warrant expired. He also questioned the affidavits from Yahoo and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children that were used to support the application for a search warrant.”

This man is entitled to the presumption of innocence. Fine. But if he is guilty of these crimes, I hope he’s prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Source: Article

Related Posts:

Comments are closed.